Career Confusion Is a Systems Failure — Not a Student Failure

Every year, we ask millions of young people to make some of the most consequential decisions of their lives—about education, training, and careers—while giving them remarkably little real experience or meaningful guidance.

Then, when they struggle, we blame them. We call them unmotivated, entitled, unrealistic, or disengaged. We say they lack resilience or work ethic. We point to their screen time, their expectations, or their attitudes. We talk about a “skills gap,” as if the problem lies primarily inside the young person.

But what if the problem isn’t the student at all? What if career confusion is not a personal failure, but a systems failure?

The Impossible Task We Give Young People

Imagine being asked to choose a destination without ever having travelled. No map. No guide. No stories from people who’ve been there.Just a stack of brochures describing thousands of places you’ve never seen.

That is how many young people experience career planning. In most school systems, students are expected to:

• Select courses that will shape their future options

• Choose postsecondary pathways

• Understand labour market trends

• Make financial decisions about tuition and debt

• Imagine what they want their lives to look like at age 30, 40, or 50

All before they have held more than a part-time job, or sometimes any job at all. We are asking them to make adult decisions without adult experiences.

Information Is Not Enough

For decades, governments and organizations have invested heavily in labour market information systems:

• Career websites

• Occupational profiles

• Salary databases

• Job outlook forecasts

• Skills inventories

• Online quizzes and interest assessments

These tools are valuable. But on their own, they rarely change behaviour. Why? Because information is abstract. Careers are lived experiences.

A job description does not convey:

• What it feels like to solve a real problem

• How a team works together under pressure

• The satisfaction of building or fixing something

• The culture of a workplace

• The rhythm of a typical day

Young people do not make life decisions based on static information alone. They make them based on stories, relationships, and experiences.

The Power of Career Conversations

Research from Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the OECD consistently shows the same pattern: Young people who have meaningful interactions with adults from the world of work:

• Develop clearer aspirations

• Make more informed course selections

• Experience smoother transitions after graduation

• Earn more in early adulthood

• Report higher job satisfaction

These interactions don’t have to be elaborate. They can be:

• A 30-minute conversation with a volunteer career coach

• A workplace visit

• A guest speaker in a classroom

• A mentorship relationship

• A short-term project with a local employer

What matters is that the interaction is:

• Authentic

• Personal

• Two-way

• Connected to real work

When young people see how adults found their paths—often through twists, detours, and unexpected opportunities—they begin to understand that careers are journeys, not single decisions.

The Myth of the Perfect Choice

Many systems still operate on a hidden assumption: that the goal of career guidance is to help a young person choose the “right” occupation. But in a world shaped by automation, artificial intelligence, climate transitions, and shifting global supply chains, there is no single right choice. Most young people entering the workforce today will:

• Change jobs many times

• Work in roles that don’t yet exist

• Need to reskill or upskill repeatedly

• Combine multiple interests over a lifetime

What they need is not a perfect answer at age 16 or 18. They need:

• Adaptability

• Curiosity

• Networks

• Confidence

• Decision-making skills

• Access to supportive adults and mentors

These are developed through experiences and conversations, not just information.

When Systems Fail, Students Get Blamed

Consider what happens in a typical system:

1. Students receive limited exposure to real careers.

2. They are asked to make high-stakes decisions anyway.

3. Many choose pathways that don’t suit them.

4. They change programs, drop out, or feel disengaged.

5. Employers report skill shortages.

6. Policymakers talk about motivation, resilience, or “fixing the youth.”

The system creates the conditions for confusion—then labels the confused as the problem.

This is the career-development equivalent of asking someone to drive in an unfamiliar city with no road signs, and then criticizing them for getting lost.

A Different Way to Think About It

If we accept that career confusion is a systems failure, not a student failure, the policy response changes dramatically. Instead of asking:

• “What’s wrong with these kids?”

• “Why aren’t they more motivated?”

• “Why can’t they choose better?”

We start asking:

• How many meaningful career conversations does each student have?

• How early do those conversations begin?

• How diverse are the adults they meet from the world of work?

• How often do they see workplaces firsthand?

• How easy is it for employers to engage with schools?

In other words, we start measuring and improving the system around the student.

Career Development as Public Infrastructure

We treat roads, bridges, and power grids as essential infrastructure because the economy depends on them. But the most important infrastructure of all is human talent. If millions of young people:

• Enter programs they later abandon

• Drift through jobs without direction

• Fail to connect their strengths to real opportunities

• Or never see themselves in key sectors of the economy

…then the whole country pays the price. Lower productivity.Higher social costs.Weaker communities.Lost potential. Career development, when designed early and governed deliberately, is among the highest-leverage public investments available to modern economies.

What a Better System Looks Like

In a system designed for success, every young person would:

• Begin career conversations in the middle grades

• Meet a wide range of adults from different occupations

• Visit real workplaces

• Reflect on their strengths and interests

• Explore multiple pathways—university, college, apprenticeship, entrepreneurship, and more

• Have ongoing access to trained career development professionals

By the time they graduate, they wouldn’t have a single fixed plan. But they would have:

• A direction

• A network

• A sense of possibility

• And the confidence to take their next step

• 
  

The Ripple Effect

When one young person finds a satisfying, well-aligned career path, the benefits extend far beyond the individual. They affect:

• Their mental health and well-being

• Their family’s stability

• Their employer’s productivity

• Their community’s vitality

• And the country’s economic strength

Multiply that effect across millions of citizens, and career development becomes not just an educational issue—but a nation-building strategy.

A Call to Action

If we truly want to reduce youth unemployment, skill shortages, and disengagement, we must stop treating career confusion as a personal flaw. It is a signal that the system around the student is not doing its job. Every parent, educator, employer, policymaker, and community leader can play a role by:

• Talking with young people about their work

• Opening doors to workplaces

• Supporting career education in schools

• Investing in professional career guidance

• Building systems that connect learning with real opportunities

Because when young people are confused, the question isn’t:

“What’s wrong with them?” The real question is: “What kind of system did we build around them—and how can we make it better?”